Dyno test

Talk to Otto at Engines by Otto in Sugar Grove, Il He can do a trike on a adjustable two track dyno that is sometimes used for automobiles. He is a top notch engine tuner. His phone is (630) 466-3900. He is not cheap but he's very good.
 
Mine is 97.89 Hp and 99.9 lbs torque.... Big boar kit, 103, pipes heavy breather 255 s/e cams after market tuner..... I am going to get true duals for her this spring and re-tune... Prolly loose small amount of punch but will need to pull the heat away from the wife's leg.... Also have the 32 tooth sprocket on the front....
 
I had my 07 CVO Ultra with Lehman conversion dyno'd at Superstition HD in Apache Junction, AZ last summer after installation of Wood TW7 cams and SE Pro Super Tuner in 110 CI engine with Ness big-sucker AC & Rhinehart true duals w/ quiet baffles.<br />
<br />
The torque curve with the TW7 cams is fairly flat starting out at 1800 - 2100 RPM with 80 ft-lbs, rises to 90 ft-lbs @ 2500 RPM, max's at 92 ft-lbs @ 3000 RPM, and stays above 90 ft-lbs until around 4200 RPM. The low-end torque and flat torque curve produced by the TW7 cams seem to be a better match for a trike than the SE255's that came stock on the bike.<br />
<br />
Although the engine performs better than it ever has (smoother, cooler, better performance), I am a little disappointed in the overall torque numbers as a trike compared to bike. The dyno tune/test that was run shortly before the trike conversion showed 85 ft-lbs @ 2300 RPM, 100 ft-lbs @ 2800 RPM, 110 ft-lbs @ 3500 RPM, holding above 100 ft-lbs until around 4500 RPM. <br />
<br />
The technician at SHD as well as the owner of another performace shop that does alot of dyno work on both bikes & trikes have stated that they normally see lower torque numbers on trikes than bikes by about 20%. <br />
<br />
Anyone else have a similar experience??<br />
<br />
hepengr
 
Had true duals on my last ultra and did a cam change V/H fuel pack and big sucker 2 didn't notice much difference in it...Actually ran
better after the mods used Andrews 26 g cams and SS gear drive... it pulled like a truck !!!!! Oh it was a 88 incher...
 
Otto in Sugar Grove did some work on my 1997 Road King. It's great to know he has the dyno to tune Trikes. Will have to run out there in Spring,, Ride Safe!
 
The technician at SHD as well as the owner of another performace shop that does alot of dyno work on both bikes & trikes have stated that they normally see lower torque numbers on trikes than bikes by about 20%.

Anyone else have a similar experience??

hepengr

Their correct, a Trike will show lower numbers due to the increased rotating weight of the drive train.
 
Then Harley is taking the advertized specs of 100ftlbs of toruque for the TRI from a two wheel 103 motorcycle more likley from crankshaft.

Their numbers are taken at the crank. One thing I find funny is they arrive at 101 ft/lb at 3,500 rpm from the present 103 and the same numbers on the old CVO 103. What I find odd is the night and day differance in heads, cams and pistons between the old CVO 103 and the present 103, I do smell a skunk around some place.
 
Their correct, a Trike will show lower numbers due to the increased rotating weight of the drive train.

I expected that the torque numbers at the rear wheel would be somewhat lower for a trike than a bike due to increased losses in the drive train and
turning two rear wheels and tires instead of one. I just didn't expect the loss in torque to be 18 - 20 ft-lbs / 16 - 18 % between the bike and trike.

I really became concerned when I saw that the torque numbers quoted for the 103" in a TG were higher, until I learned that the figures for the TG were from the spec sheet (rated at the crankshaft) rather than torque measured at the rear wheels.

Anyone out there have torque/hp numbers dyno chart from their TG or conversion?

Hepengr
 
Just received dyno sheet from dealer. I am not sure what these numbers mean but I will read what it says.
Max Power=73.65 Max Torque=87.80

I am no expert but it seems kinda low for a 103...But who knows what the MOCO has done to the new engines with the cat. in the head pipe... I'm betting it isn't good because of emissions....
 
I am no expert but it seems kinda low for a 103...But who knows what the MOCO has done to the new engines with the cat. in the head pipe... I'm betting it isn't good because of emissions....

If its a stock 103 I believe the numbers considering the extra loose from heavier rear wheel and the differential. My dads 09 Triglide with SE Stage 1 AC, SE 4" mufflers and SE255 cams went 94 ft/lb torque.
 

Welcome to the Trike Talk Community

Join our vibrant online community dedicated to all things Trikes! Whether you're a seasoned rider or just starting out, this is the place to share experiences, tips, and stories about your three-wheeled adventures. Explore modifications, maintenance advice, and rides, all while connecting with fellow trike enthusiasts from around the globe

Forum statistics

Threads
55,376
Messages
804,548
Members
23,943
Latest member
mudrock
Back
Top Bottom