Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/\...All the more reason to vote Republican in November!!!.../\
For President yes.... But not all so called republican's, Are really Republican...
VOTE WISELY MY FREIND ......
For President yes.... But not all so called republican's, Are really Republican...
VOTE WISELY MY FRIEND ......
i understand what you're saying but the problem is almost 100% of Democrats are anti-gun
Theirs gotta be some Dixiecrat's still standing....:Shrug:
Unfortunately, the DNC we grew up around no longer exists. Today, they are way Left of Center.
How can anyone even think about voting Democrat, if you are Pro-2nd Amendment?
How do you take over this country? One, you control communications and the media. Two, you disarm the population.
For President yes.... But not all so called republican's, Are really Republican...
VOTE WISELY MY FREIND ......
Just remember;
If you carry, have a good 2nd Amendment Lawyer you can call.
also, make sure you say and do the right thing if you ever have
to pull your weapon out to DEFEND YOURSELF. The police will treat you like a criminal until you can prove you had no other choice but to use your pistol.:Coffee:
What makes you say this? Not a correct statement at all.
At least not in the 2 departments I was a LEO for.
SOP is to secure all weapons, take statements and if it is evident the shoot was justified, there is no arrest.
Untrue statements like this are part of the reason for the way LEO's are perceived today and not appreciated by those of us that are/were on the job.
Rant over and you have a blessed day knowing the Thin Blue Line is there for you, no matter what you sayThumbUp
i understand , and what you said in your last two sentences is what i wasDude, at the scene of a shooting the decision whether it was justified is not made until reviewed by the prosecutor. LE on the scene had BETTER treat the shooter like a suspect until proven otherwise. The shooter had BETTER exercise his rights by seeking a lawyer and not making a statement without counsel. This isn't an expression of hatred for cops, merely a statement of the current situation. If you have to use deadly force, shut your mouth and get a lawyer. Any other course of action puts you are risk of incarceration. The cops need to treat you like a suspect. Any other course of action puts them at physical and legal risk as well.
Dude, at the scene of a shooting the decision whether it was justified is not made until reviewed by the prosecutor. LE on the scene had BETTER treat the shooter like a suspect until proven otherwise. The shooter had BETTER exercise his rights by seeking a lawyer and not making a statement without counsel. This isn't an expression of hatred for cops, merely a statement of the current situation. If you have to use deadly force, shut your mouth and get a lawyer. Any other course of action puts you are risk of incarceration. The cops need to treat you like a suspect. Any other course of action puts them at physical and legal risk as well.
There's a democrat senator out of WV (Joe Manchin), that's 100% NRA and pro gun. But YES, he's about the only one. He's also pro coal. He's butted heads with the Obama administration ever since he came into office.i understand what you're saying but the problem is almost 100% of Democrats are anti-gun.
He is absolutely correct. Usually the only negative thing that happens is IF you have to use your weapon, it will be confiscated until after all investigation into the shooting is completed (at least in this area).What makes you say this? Not a correct statement at all.
At least not in the 2 departments I was a LEO for.
SOP is to secure all weapons, take statements and if it is evident the shoot was justified, there is no arrest.
Untrue statements like this are part of the reason for the way LEO's are perceived today and not appreciated by those of us that are/were on the job.
Rant over and you have a blessed day knowing the Thin Blue Line is there for you, no matter what you sayThumbUp
Really! Because when you first arrive, the circumstances of the incident are unknown. That's why it's call securing the scene!This may be true in your jurisdiction. Is it true in NY, Boston, or Los Angeles? Further, at first response all safety minded police MUST treat the shooter as a suspect. Otherwise, why even secure the weapons? I'm sure you know many wise, experienced law enforcement officers. I know a few, but they are a dwindling breed. I'm running into more and more who are basically anti-gun or gun ignorant, and will treat you as a suspect. It does no harm and ensures your legal safety if you put off giving a full statement for several hours and consult with an attorney first. As far as misinformation creating a bad rep for law enforcement, there is some truth to that, however, there are many other factors involved such as asset forfeiture, the war on drugs, and LE often being simply wrong and wrong-headed. If you would like to discuss these issues further, feel free to PM me, but lets discuss with an open mind.
Exactly.Really! Because when you first arrive, the circumstances of the incident are unknown. That's why it's call securing the scene!
Hope you never halfto use it �� However as I always say : better to have it and not need it than Need it and not have it !