Just wondering what brand everybody is using, those of you who do use it? I'm wondering if any particular kind is better or more economical to use.
thanks
thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never used any kind of fuel additive except StalBil when I use to store the bike over the winter years ago.
I've never used anything other than 87 octane fuel and during the winter I may go 2,3 or 4 weeks before being able to go for a ride. I have never had a problem. Gas is already too expensive so I'm not going to add any more cost to it.......IF I don't have to. ThumbUp
Many times I've used gas (lawn mower-snowblower and even my TG) stored in a 2 gal. or 5 gal. container that was at least a year old and never had any problems.
I guess I'm just lucky when it comes to fuel. :Angel:
I can't remember ever having fuel problems of any kind.......other then running out of it a couple times.![]()
I agree, I have always used 87 octane fuel and have not had a problem...
msocko3, how long will it take to do that kind of damage?
Like I've said, I've been using 87 since forever and not had one engine problem.
Never used premium, never will.
Maybe some day I'll have a problem, but that's something I'll have to live with IF it happens. I have a stock engine with no mods - if I did I'd probably have to use a more expensive fuel. That's why I stay stock. ThumbUp
If you have pinging and must run booster, I try to find a product which uses a metal additive such as TEL (tetraethyl lead). Boosters which use petroleum distilates only, usually only boost a minute amount. One common misunderstanding when choosing boosters is what a "point" is. If it raises your octane six "points" that is actually .6 octane. So 87 would go to 87.6. Also be aware running some high performance boosters can upset O2 sensors.
I wouldn't put anything like tetraethyl lead in with O2 sensors or a cat ! It will mess up both in a heart beat !
I run Lucas booster, or 104 booster. Both are compatible with the O2"s.pepper
sportytrike, you make a good point. That's why I don't use anything other then straight 87 gas - no additives.
msocko3, The computor will adjust any pinging problems so I'm not worried about unheard pinging.
I started to just move on because it feels like I'm beating a dead horse, but I can't. The computer isn't the know all be all automatic adjuster, it will only compensate so far. I several examples of the computer only compensating so far. In 2008 my 06 Ultra started pinging in areas it never pinged before, it would do it time and time again. I hooked the lap top to it and started doing some data runs using the SERT it had been tuned with. When reviewing the data I found multiple hits where it was pulling timing due to pinging, some places it was taking 10 degrees out, and that wasn't stopping the ping. I ended up chasing it down to a bad plug wire, strangest damn thing I ever saw but new wires and all the ping was gone. The computer wasn't smart enough or couldn't compensate enough to keep it from happening.
2010 my dad and I are out west both riding Triglides, his 09 and my 10, both running SE255 cams. Around home with 91 - 93 octane fuel no issues. Got out west and all we could find at a couple stops was 89 octane with 10% ethanol, they both pinged like crazy until we dosed them with octane booster. Once again the computer wasn't able to make compensations for fuel which didn't have the capability to support the CCP and timing we were running.
Now I could have neutered the performance and pulled a boat load of timing out but that would have came with more of a penalty than just a power loss, it would have created more heat which would have lead to more pinging, the perfect storm.
2011 once again my dad and I are out west with the Triglides, this time running Wood TW555 cams. I was able to run that 89 octane with 10 ethanol and not have any issues, my dad on the other hand had a pinger.
The computer didn't compensate for it, it couldn't, it just pinged and pinged and pinged up every hill.
I finally was able to tweak the timing a touch and solved the problem.
Moral of the story is the computer can only go so far. Just like the fallacy magazines have a lot of people believing they can install exhaust and air cleaner and the computer will compensate, its not so. Anyone who tunes these things and has witnessed what the AFR looks like while on the dyno knows its not so. Its not uncommon for air cleaner and exhaust changes to have 17.1 AFR in some of the areas of the tune, the computer just can't compensate without a little help from a tuner to educate it a little bit.
:Agree: Mike you need to make a copy of your post & you won't have to type it all again. You know you will have to say it again !
People believe what the book says until it costs a few thousand ! Never has & never will replace experience !!
:Trike1:
Have two brothers that were in the service station bussiness for many years. They both told me that the octane rating you see on the pump is the minimum required by law. They said it was common for a posted octane to actually test higher.